Why loafing can be work
Daydreaming, promenading and zoning out pay rich dividends
THE FAMILIAR exerts a powerful subliminal appeal. The “name-letter effect” refers to the subconscious bias that people have for the letters in their own name, and for their own initials in particular. They are more likely to choose careers, partners and brands that start with their initials (Joe becomes a joiner, marries Judy and loves Jaffa cakes). A related bias, the “well-travelled-road effect”, describes the tendency of people to ascribe shorter travelling times to familiar routes than is actually the case.
A bias towards the familiar shows up at work, too. One such prejudice is about what exactly constitutes work. Being at a desk counts as work, as does looking at a screen above a certain size. Responding to email and being in a meeting are indubitably forms of work. So is any activity that might elicit sympathy if performed on the weekend—typing, taking a phone call from the boss, opening any type of spreadsheet.
This article appeared in the Business section of the print edition under the headline "Loafing can be work"
Business March 19th 2022
- Russia’s war is creating corporate winners and losers
- CNN+ enters the streaming business at a newsy moment
- Western firms’ thorny Russian dilemmas
- Banks and firms face a mammoth sanctions-compliance challenge
- Is this the beginning of the end of China’s techlash?
- Why the WeWork fiasco makes for compelling TV
- Why loafing can be work
- Has Silicon Valley lost its monopoly over global tech?
More from Business
Is America Inc’s war for talent over?
Competition has cooled—for now
Big tech’s great AI power grab
Alphabet, Amazon and Microsoft are on the hunt for new energy sources
Does Perplexity’s “answer engine” threaten Google?
Taking aim at one of the best business models of all time